  | 
           
              David Grosz, New York Sun, July 1, 2004 
            Christoph Buchel's 
              latest installation is more than merely on display at the 
              Swiss Institute. It has taken over the entire gallery, converting 
              a SoHo exhibition space into a facsimile of a dirty, uninviting 
              apartment. While some may 
              mock the work's "transformative" pretensions, Mr. Buchel's 
              faux-apartment is intellectually provocative and playful. 
            The installation 
              tells a story of division, a fact announced at the front door, which 
              is bisected by a 4-inch cinderblock wall that winds through the 
              entire apartment. The wall separates a path that leads to the right 
              - through a messy bathroom with half a tub - from the path to the 
              left - which winds past a spare kitchenette, a dark, depressing 
              bedroom and an unbearably narrow study to the other half of the 
              bedroom and tub. In some places, this creates spaces so cramped 
              that Manhattan studios seem luxurious in comparison. 
            But this is 
              not the work's primary dichotomy. For there is a second, outer apartment 
              that wraps around the inner apartment's side and back walls in a 
              giant U-shape. This second apartment, accessed through a passageunder 
              the bathroom sink, or by scaling the cinder block wall, contains 
              an inviting bed, a more comfortable living space, and a kitchen 
              full of modern appliances (as well as a healthy collection of Budweiser). 
              As a bastion of suburban comforts, it stands in sharp contrast to 
              the depressively Spartan inner space. 
            Mr. Buchel has 
              intentionally withheld an artist's statement and title from his 
              double apartment, leaving us to conjecture on our own about its 
              meaning. Is this an allegoryof an impossible roommate situation? 
              A before-and-after story of a suburban adolescent become a post-collegiate 
              life as struggling artist? A gloss on "The Road Not Taken?" 
               
            Symbolic interpretation 
              may be the wrong approach for this installation; unlike most, it 
              is far more fun to experience than to think about. The work is most 
              challenging as an urban obstacle course: It requires you to walk 
              sideways through the apartment's narrow hallways, duck into the 
              bathroom opening, slither through the closet space that links the 
              two apartments, hop onto the second apartment's bed, wind your way 
              around its L-shaped living room, and climb over a half-wall to arrive 
              at the second kitchen. Should you make it this far, feel free to 
              reward yourself with an ice-cold Bud from the well-stocked fridge. 
              As a frat-house-worthy pyramid of cans attests, you will harldy 
              be the first. 
               
             
              
  |